The story of Charlie Gard, a medically frail baby in England is the latest of many perfect examples of why we don’t need single payer healthcare liberals are trying to encumber on we the people.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account and connect your subscription to it by clicking here.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
Editor:
The story of Charlie Gard, a medically frail baby in England is the latest of many perfect examples of why we don’t need single payer healthcare liberals are trying to encumber on we the people. U.K. Socialized medicine gives the hospital the right to terminate anyone one’s life because care costs too much.
Charlie suffers from mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome, a very rare disorder often fatal. Charlie’s is severe enough he currently can’t survive without life support. Because the disease is so rare, very few medical facilities are equipped with the advanced procedures necessary for treatment. That is why the hospital caring for Charlie filed a lawsuit to be allowed to take Charlie off of life without the parents’ consent. Because the state is paying for care, the doctors were able to argue that the cost of life support for an untreatable child was not worthwhile.
Paul E. Puebla
Torrington